I Conquered China By Leading JUST Won World War IIV Contra The East Asians: What Just Personal Gains Is Costing In The First 2.25 Years A Season After The War Was Officially Ended

Featured




At least 2.25 year Envy demon sufferer phenethylamine addict hate own guy anti military leader Joe Valentyn religicide – anti Life Line – castration attempt – biological weapon attack – chemical weapon attack – other technology weapon attack – wrong hell – suicide attempt frame – anti Joe Valentyn stab attempt – anti Joe Valentyn shoot with a gun threat – anti Joe Valentyn’s Girls extortion – anti Joe Valentyn’s Girls bribery – anti JUSTICE – blindness – deafness threat – small-penis frame ultra scale – insanity-frame ultra scale – arson attempt – (other) torture – anti Joe Valentyn dismemberment attempt / deformity attempt / maim attempt mutilation attempt / disfiguration attempt: including baldening – wrong hell free – molestation frame – anti Us poltrigiestry – antisexuality rape – phony LOVE fantasy doll body/heart/mind/soul control – phony JUSTICE fantasy and/or weasel word ventriloquism – wrong-kill calumny attempt – sexuality-force convert attempt – force demon-convert attempt – demon-possession – demon-possession destroy – at least 1st degree sch********** – repressing – nulling – illusion – incontinence frame – Jens-inferior frame – phony sloth frame – indigestion frame – that was my -100% for the lead won JUST world war contra the East( sic; Eastern) Asians . . .  Now: let me escape my ”’sausage lyf”’!!!!

Zero geometry editing (meaning for each photograph):

in Real Life
Oooo . . . what do you wanna do?
Joe Valentyn protecting.

Just get in touch however you can!!!!!!!

A New Currency Concept

Featured




I posted a very Liked concept for a new currency that is time – literally hours & minutes & the Like – that I will respread here:

(The X.com post is from 2024June22ndpm12:00.)


Here is the verbatim spread content in case the X.com posts suffer bitrot or something:


JOE VALENTYN
@joevalentyn
·
Jun 22
http://X.com: I have writ a new currency concept: as we grow in culture, as we grow in technology, we are gaining more leisure time – for socialization, for the blogosphere & watching videos – for personal life deedery; (cont.)
JOE VALENTYN
@joevalentyn
(cont.) this new currency unit is not fiat currency, nor de facto currency: it is time – manhours – people’s lives they can share with you.
Time as a currency is something everyone has, & that still each person’s worth – including for other people – is different. Time (cont.)
12:00 PM · Jun 22, 2024
·
31
Views
View post engagements
JOE VALENTYN
JOE VALENTYN
@joevalentyn
·
Jun 22
(cont.) is a better currency than gold & silver & a better currency than fiat currency like the dollar or euro . . . & better than a new Japanese computer currency. It is perhaps the purest currency . . .
(cont.)
JOE VALENTYN
@joevalentyn
·
Jun 22
(cont.) In the earliest sketch for this, you would agree how long & when you exchange your personal Love, care, kindness, & niceness for some agreed product and/or service.

⸻ ValentynJoe
USAMinnesota
2024June28th

We Have A Phony Computing Invention Buzzword Versus Real Computing Invention Term Of Art Trend




“The AI era” – “The AI revolution” – “breakthrough”: This is getting absurd:

Ethical study / ethical research is Good; Big Data is wrong;

weak AI (unconscious machines) is real; strong AI (conscious machines) is phony;

expert systems – unconscious algorithms to aid decision – & (other) theorem provers – math & logic proof makers – are real; AI / neural nets – statistical guessing – are dubious at best;

genetic algorithms – nothing to do with biological genetics literally: fitness conditions being met by output from genetics-like (exhaustive) recombination to get the most fit recombination – that is then repeated to get more & more desirable recombinations – is real; machine learning / Deep Learning is a buzzword fraud.

Watch out for other phony/real terms in this trend . . .

⸻ ValentynJoe
USAMinnesota
2024June28th

Contra Anti Life Concept / Life Philosophy Concept Plagiarism Attempt By The Ill Come Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very( Sic;) Rogue JUSTICE Department Party Party Notice Mini




Updated: 8:32 am central U.S. time 2024June11th:


“This is what made Life bad . . . ” I thought I’d say as I woke as a new baby: that is how I responded to them. They expect you to put out like a business’s machine.

Good luck to you!: you’re gonna need it!

⸻ ValentynJoe
USAMinnesota
2024June11th

Contra Anti Agenda / Calendar / Schedule / Time Keeping Device / Prioritizer / Dater / Search Software Big Pharma Rip Off Plagiarism Attempt Notice




Big Pharma has been malevolent in my Life: I plagiaristeeely (meaning plagiarism victim -ly) found that Big Pharma both kills, attempts to kill *AND* plagiarizes their victims.

Please stop these eugenicists from both wrong killing, attempting to kill *AND* stealing the gold from their victims. This is egregious – citing I have engineered this for 7.5 years.

Thank you for reading my plea.

⸻ ValentynJoe
USAMinnesota
2024June8th

Contra Anti Living( Sic; Livelihood) Concept Plagiarism Recidivism Attempt




A different (different) Big Dataist rip off artist has attempted to plagiarize my & my own Mom’s living( sic; livelihood) concept for a time #3 – he is a drug addict & suffers other addictions & problems. Please let me keep such a dream living( sic; livelihood) concept, prospect I have earned . . .

⸻ ValentynJoe
USAMinnesota
2024June8th

Contra Anti Different Larger Scale Providence Recidivist Plagiarist Plagiarism Attempt Notice Mini




The elf is a compulsive *********** & compulsive work plagiarist! This cannot be: I’ve worked for years to develop this software & this philosophy & he tries to steal it 2X in his phenethylamine addiction rush!

He long owes for a separate operation he attempted/committed around ultra scale . . . to continue from 2 Decembers past (2022’s) thru to this! – this one has another thing comin’.

⸻ ValentynJoe
USAMinnesota
2024June3rd

Manual Care by Polling As Better Than Programming “Pushes”: A Dialogue




Updated title 2024June7th/June8th overnite.

{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:08’13”} <lakitu> do I have this right: there must be a “poll”( sic; “polling”) for a “push”?
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:08’20”} <dude> wonder who owns what of nvidia
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:08’40”} <lakitu> to the higher programming masters here . . .
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:09’09”} <dude> lakitu idk what that is bro
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:10’12”} <lakitu> consider a `sleep` function that then “pushes”: it polls every however long until the duration total equals the `sleep` duration, then the “push” is executed.
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:10’22”} <FeeginnersMind> lakitu: Polling and pushing are opposites. Not sure what you’re saying.
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:10’37”} <dude> dang guess I should’ve spent my student loans on nvidia stocks
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:10’52”} <lakitu> (((* consider a `sleep` *containing *function that then “pushes”: it polls every however long until the duration total equals the `sleep` duration, then the “push” is executed.)))
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:11’04”} <lakitu> misprint.
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:11’26”} <FeeginnersMind> lakitu: The “there must be a poll” still doesn’t make sense.
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:11’51”} * RazielZ (~Raziel@user/raziel) has joined
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:11’51”} <dude> yeah drop the poll/push terminology
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:11’52”} * naomi-lgbt has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:11’53”} <FeeginnersMind> lakitu: You of course can poll and push in a loop, if you really want. Nobody will arrest you.
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:12’08”} <FeeginnersMind> At least probably not for that.
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:12’48”} <lakitu> FeeginnersMind: I ask for some patience then . . . a directory that “pushes” when receiving a file is polling . . . that is one example.
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:13’05”} <lakitu> FeeginnersMind: the `sleep` containing function is another example . . .
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:13’10”} <FeeginnersMind> Pushing and polling are opposites.
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:13’43”} <lakitu> I’m not sure you’re considering this how I am . . .
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:13’48”} <FeeginnersMind> Polling is checking for data before pulling it.
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:13’57”} <FeeginnersMind> Pulling and pushing go in opposite directions.
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:14’02”} <dude> shamelessshill did everyone at intel get old? like what happened lol
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:14’20”} <dude> itanium can’t have been that bad
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:14’42”} * interop_madness (~interop_m@user/interop-madness/x-0950004) has joined
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:15’13”} * Raziel has quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:15’24”} <lakitu> how `sleep` functions & other related functions work on a central processing unit (CPU) scale, I think we’re still talking polling for most any usual “push” I can think . . .
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:15’25”} <dude> idk why chips are even being made in Taiwan in the first place
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:15’59”} <FeeginnersMind> lakitu: You keep saying the same thing, we keep saying no…
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:16’01”} * anovick (~anovick@2001:4df4:5700:2a00:7004:63c9:331c:c944) has joined
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:16’32”} <FeeginnersMind> lakitu: There might be some underlying truth to what you are trying to say, but what you are actually saying does not come across as right.
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:16’43”} * kkawg ([email protected]) has joined
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:16’58”} <lakitu> FeeginnersMind: I gave two examples.
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:17’34”} <Affliction> lakitu: depends on the chip, and the software… Let’s simplify it down: simple code running bare metal on a microcontroller
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:17’58”} <Affliction> Generally there’d be a timer peripheral that can be asked to deliver an interrupt after n “ticks” of whatever clock it uses
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:18’05”} <lakitu> consider a loop that checks for something to do, then sleeps. this is like polling in a “push”
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:18’11”} <Affliction> The CPU can be placed into a sleep state until that timer fires an interrupt.
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:18’17”} <Affliction> That would be a “push”
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:18’22”} <FeeginnersMind> lakitu: What does push have to do with it?
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:18’31”} <Alphie> lakitu: try describing what you’re talking about without using the words ‘poll’ or ‘push’ or the letter ‘e’ :P
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:18’33”} <Affliction> Polling would be where the CPU continuously samples the timer, waiting for it to reach a given value.
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:18’35”} * agent314 has quit (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:18’45”} <dude> time based interrupts? is that watchdog?
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:18’53”} * agent314 ([email protected]) has joined
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:19’16”} <Affliction> in a way, though watchdog timers generally reset the chip (or just cpu) completely
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:19’24”} * Jackneill ([email protected]) has joined
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:19’40”} FeeginnersMind indyZ inhahe` Inline inspork interop_madness
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:19’42”} <Affliction> If there’s other work to do, the CPU can run that other task until it receives the timer interrupt too
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:19’45”} <dude> interesting
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:19’58”} <lakitu> right (`Affliction`)
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:20’06”} * vdamewood (~vdamewood@fedora/vdamewood) has joined
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:20’26”} <Affliction> on a multitasking OS, things will be a bit more complex, generally there would be a timer that fires periodically that triggers task switches
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:20’39”} <Affliction> and sleep() just marks a process as not-runnable
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:20’53”} <vdamewood> Hi, people etc.
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:20’57”} <dude>   sup
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:21’01”} <Affliction> The OS might take note of the desired time of sleeping tasks and use another hardware timer to wake them up at a precise time
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:21’21”} <Affliction> Or, it might only wake tasks up at the resolution of the main task-switching timer
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:21’21”} <lakitu> I might have understood pushes at a deeper level, is what I was wondering. polling is pretty important. `Affliction` looks like he gets it . . .
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:21’22”} * Stefan27 ([email protected]) has joined
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:21’41”} <lakitu> (I see.)
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:21’43”} * Gnana (22450@user/Gnana) has joined
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:21’52”} <Affliction> Now, you might use polling in a precise version of sleep()
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:22’04”} <dude> I don’t normally see the term push wrt to process cycle tbh
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:22’48”} <Affliction> If your multitaskign OS switches task every millisecond, and you want to wait exactly 1650 microseconds, you might sleep() for 1000 microseconds, then poll the timer until the given time is reached.
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:23’13”} <kkawg> don’t you time the MHz
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:23’17”} <lakitu> oh nice!!
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:23’31”} * dislabled_ ([email protected]) has joined
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:23’38”} <lakitu> ((re `Affliction`))
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:23’50”} <Affliction> kkawg: That might be one of the timers, sure, if your CPU has a counter.
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:24’26”} * dislabled has quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:24’34”} <Affliction> lakitu: So yeah, even for sleep(), interrupts and polling can both be used.
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:25’30”} <lakitu> Affliction: & that’s crazy
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:25’47”} <lakitu> they pit them contra each other –
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:25’50”} <Affliction> Most other hardware, eg, think network cards with incoming packets, will generally deliver interrupts instead of being polled
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:26’02”} <lakitu> for defending the Internet of Things (IoT) . . .
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:27’10”} * AquaL1te (~AquaL1te@user/aqual1te) has joined
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:27’34”} * shamelessshill has quit (Ping timeout: 268 seconds)
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:29’01”} <Affliction> And of course, modern high perf desktop CPUs benefit from staying in sleep, my 16 core 3950X can idle at what it reports as 7 watts, but even a tiny bit of cpu load that keeps both core chips alive, will bring it up to ~25.
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:29’19”} <Affliction> I’d expect having all 16 cores spin in a tight loop, would waste a ton of po[w]er
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:30’01”} <lakitu> you can manually poll (at human time scales) – check something one time a week for example – versus being merely able to (what they describe as) “push” an Internet of Things (IoT) thing.
{central U.S. time CDT (-0500) am 02:30’39”} <Affliction> sure, things can interrupt you too

⸻ ValentynJoe
USAMinnesota
2024June6th