conversation – a invention of a new (”’ideometric”’) ‘scope’: crosschecking the 7 deadly sins against government units often




[20:45] <lakitu> in my video lectures, i introduced scoping. i just thought of a great e.g. political idea using it. take the 7 deadly sins & crosscheck them against each gov unit, to remediate them of those things. i wonder if the idea is, like the song says, i can see clearly now the rain is gone =) gonna be a bright (bright) sunshiney day — if you can clear the grevious or hidden mistakes, perhaps ‘what you need to do’ & ‘how you need to do
[20:45] <lakitu> it’ become more obvious
[20:48] <lakitu> at the least, it would be very helpful
[20:48] <lakitu> you’d want very sapient scholars of the 7 deadly sins, their various interpretations
[20:49] <lakitu> that could be an ongoing thing
[20:51] <lakitu> you ask where the ideas of laws come from, they are the codifications of ethics. if you look into who is the main provider of ethics, it’s Da Christianity. (Da Christianity)
[20:53] <lakitu> thinking on the commandments, maybe God really intended for us not to kill. if so, we should steer toward nonfatal weapons, like stunguns
[20:59] <lakitu> re the truth of Christian morals a cumudgeonous agnostic conceded, you can see how these two land features align: one of the earliest commandments i remember is thou shall not kill – how much do we protest & loathe war?
[21:01] <lakitu> you can try to cut God out of every picture you see, but eventually what you put up to challenge Him will pale, in my beliefs. for example, try writing a ground like the Bible
[21:03] * lakitu it has to do with the meterological forces of the Spiritual plane, mumbles to himself
[21:03] <lakitu> it just wouldn’t work
[21:03] <lakitu> people have tried
[21:03] <lakitu> i think
[21:05] <lakitu> best to have community, & cooperate with the religious